9 posts tagged with "uniswap"

We have written before about how our effectively non-concentrated, full-range Uniswap v4 positions keep doing their job in the background. That is still true.

Meanwhile, some of our concentrated SOL/USDC positions have been priced out by the recent move lower. Could we rebalance them? Yes. But right now that would mean adjusting into weakness and likely locking in a loss just to get active again. So for the moment, we are waiting.

The contrast is worth highlighting: while the SOL/USDC ranges are idle, these two small Uniswap v4 positions on Ethereum are still earning.

Cross-border stablecoin liquidity usually gets discussed like a future theme.

That is too early-stage, too institutional, too niche. The flow is coming later. The pipes are not ready yet. Wait until the euro side gets bigger.

I think that framing is getting stale.

The more interesting question on April 3, 2026 is not whether euro stablecoins are "ready" in some abstract sense. It is whether USDC/EURC pools are starting to behave like real FX venues instead of symbolic DeFi pairings.

In a few places, the answer is yes.

That does not mean every USDC/EURC pool is attractive. It does not mean euro stablecoin liquidity is suddenly a core portfolio bucket. It does mean the market has moved past pure narrative. There is now enough routing activity in the best pools to treat cross-border stable LPing as a real liquidity strategy rather than a thought experiment.

If you provide liquidity on Uniswap today, you are no longer choosing between "good pool" and "bad pool." You are choosing between versions, fee tiers, hooks, and routing behavior that can all compete for the same order flow.

That is the real state of Uniswap in 2026: ETH and other blue-chip tokens are fragmented across v2, v3, and v4 at the same time, and the trader-facing router is optimized for best execution, not for sending volume to the pool you personally funded.

If you want to know whether liquidity provision still makes sense in March 2026, the first question is simple: is real trading flow still there?

As of March 13, 2026, the answer is clearly yes. DEX traders are still moving billions of dollars a day across Solana, Ethereum, Base, BSC, and Arbitrum. That does not mean every pool is worth touching, but it does mean the raw material for LP returns, swap volume, is absolutely still present.

Crypto is deep in a drawdown as 2026 opens. Bitcoin has retraced hard from last fall's highs, and volatility has returned to daily trading. For liquidity providers, that means narrower ranges are getting knocked out faster and fee momentum is harder to sustain.

Two days ago, we published an analysis of three Uniswap v4 positions showing modest APRs-3.58% on ETH/USDC, 0.28% on USDC/USDT, and 1.21% on ETH/WBTC. Today, those same positions tell a completely different story: 25.56% APR, 2.26% APR, and 8.03% APR respectively.

This dramatic improvement isn't magic-it's what happens when you stay patient with liquidity provision on Ethereum.

One of the most common questions we get from liquidity providers is: "What price range should I use for my SOL/USDC concentrated liquidity position?"

The answer isn't simple-it depends on your risk tolerance, time horizon, and market outlook. But by analyzing historical price action, technical levels, and practical LP strategies, we can identify ranges that work for different types of liquidity providers.

Uniswap v4 is live, and real liquidity providers are already putting it to the test. The screenshot above shows three active positions across different trading pairs, fee tiers, and strategies-giving us a real-world snapshot of how v4 performs in practice.

Uniswap v4 has arrived, and while adoption is still in its early stages, it's already showing some intriguing behavior for liquidity providers-especially for those running wide-range positions.